As I heard the story, Denkart ported Image to the 9000, it worked, it was fast,
and it looked the same as the version on the 3000. What I heard was that HP
owned part of Denkart, and didn't want Image on the 9000, so had the project
killed.
I know at least two other people that have ported Image to DOS and possibly to
Unix. It was pretty wild to transfer a schema to the PC and run it through that
version of DBSCHEMA and have it work. Actuall, MicroSpeedware did a very
similar trick when it first came on the scene 12 years or so ago (back when I
worked at Infocentre).
Shawn
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: HP Image on HP-UX
Author: [log in to unmask] at Internet-Mail
Date: 5/28/98 3:35 PM
>I may be wrong (after all, I am a salesman now), but I think "p/n
92648-90005, E0989" means print date September, 1989. I vaguely
remember an excited HP VAR about a decade ago asking if Speedware
(InfoCentre at the time) was going to support the new HPImage product
(from HP) on HP-UX. They were doing some testing (Cobol, I think --
they were an MCBA reseller) on an HP9K. They said it looked "just like
Image" on the HP3K. That was about the last I ever heard of it.
Anybody got a 1989 HP9K price guide? My oldest one is 1993. It's not
in there. Chalk another one up to "What if ..."
Brent "memory fading" Flowers
>----------
>From: Charles H. Finley[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Thursday, May 28, 1998 1:57 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: HP Image on HP-UX
>
>What's the publication date? It could be about IMAGE/UX, a product of
>Denkart in Belgium.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rudderow, Evan [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Thursday, May 28, 1998 12:01 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: HP Image on HP-UX
>
>Hi all,
>
>We were recently cleaning up and I came across an interesting document:
>"800 Series HP 9000 Computer Systems HP IMAGE Release A.07.00 Read Me
>First" (p/n 92648-90005, E0989). While the document states, "HP IMAGE,
>a network database management system, uses a network database model..."
>it's also got a lot of references to DBE's and other Allbase-like
>things.
>
>Anybody know what this beastie is?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Evan
>
|