Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 31 Jan 1997 08:22:48 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Larry Boyd wrote:
>
> > This works with cereal and cars (and a lot of other consumables) because
> > I can buy a Chevy if the Cadillac is too expensive (or even a used car
> > if the new ones are too expensive) or Malt-O-Meal if the CFSB's are too
> > expensive. However, let's say I wanted to link our HP3000 in Ohio with
> > the one in Texas to do disk mirroring and provide a hot site backup.
> > How many choices of software do I have that will provide this
> > functionality? Three. NetBase from Quest or SharePlex from HP (in
> > reality the same product), or write it myself. So, we either bite the
>
> I just have to answer this one also -- Don't you think that if a vendor
> could write a product such as this, sell it for less than the
> competitors and sell enough of it that they can make a profit, that a
> vendor would? Except in industries that have extremely high costs of
> capital (which s/w definitely doesn't fit), competitors are always
> interested in entering these areas. When you find a situation such as
> this, the only rational explanation is that these two products provide
> the value for the cost. Otherwise, additional competitors will enter
> the market.
>
> LB
In this example you would be assuming that all or even some developers
had the ability to create a competitive product. There are not too many
people out there with Gavin Scott's knowledge of the HP3000 that could
even come close to creating a competitive product to Netbase.
<I'm going to get toasted for this one...>
--
*************************************
** **
** Chad Gilles **
** Sr. Software Analyst **
** ------------------------------- **
** American United Life **
** One American Sq. **
** Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368 **
** ------------------------------- **
** Ph. 317-263-1423 **
** Fx. 317-263-1956 **
** EM. [log in to unmask] **
** **
*************************************
|
|
|