HP3000-L Archives

January 2003, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Look Who is Missing
From:
Greg Cagle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Greg Cagle <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:10:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
Stan Sieler wrote:
> Re:
>
>>As some of you probably know, HP historically has ranked employees into
>>five performance bands (PRB1-5). The bands still exist; what has changed
>>is that the lowest band is *required* to contain 5%, where before it could
>>go empty. The problem is that the requirements for each band are clearly
>>defined - and now people are being forced into places where they don't
>>fit, so to speak.
>
>
> Changed?
> It's been required from time-to-time over the past 20 years.  I remember
> when Howard Smith (lab manager of 3000 lab circa 1983) got in trouble for
> not doing this.

I don't go that far back - but this is a change since I've been at
HP - since 1994.

--
Greg Cagle
gregc at gregcagle dot com

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2