Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:09:22 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wirt Atmar
>
> A number of people, including HP itself, have been recently describing
> staying on the HP3000 indefinitely as being very risky. I disagree ...
> I've spent the day writing a general reply as a web page at:
> http://aics-research.com/planb.html
Just playing devil's advocate here :) but I noticed you sprinkled the phrase
"for the next 25 years" liberally throughout the page. While I realize "25
years" is one of those "nice, round numbers", it isn't as "round" as say 30
or 50...
(in other words, I too can add 25 to 2002 and come up with 2027, MPE's "y2k"
event... ;) )
Tom Emerson
(and yes, I know, MPE has a whole slew of new intrinsics to extend the
internal date format for well beyond the rest of our natural [or even
unnatural] lives, but what guarantee will we have that the final release of
MPE will have ALL internal date-related functions converted to the new
intrinsics/data storage formats?)
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|