Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:54:23 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeff,
I am on 6.0 pp1 with the 3 reactives recommended by RC. I appreciate your
comments. I think I will try it for a while and see what happens. I have
a few librarians who are usually willing to be guinea pigs!
Wendell
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Wendell E Gragg wrote:
> >
> > Well, I have successfully brought up telnet for the first time. I do
> > have a question concerning VT-MGR vs. Telnet. Does anyone have any
> > idea as to which method is best to use? I am specifically looking
> > for info on resource utilization and stability.
>
> Assuming you have the latest telnet patches to make it a fair
> comparison, it depends on what you are trying to save. NS/VT adds
> the overhead of the VTSERVER process, while telnet plugs directly
> into JSMAIN. Telnet incurs some CPU overhead, which can be
> significantly reduced with the new line mode telnet and half-duplex
> options (QCTerm and CSY support these now), but the 'overhead fears'
> prior to it's release were never realized to be of any significance.
> And NS/VT has problems with control-Y traps, significant in the Posix
> shell.
>
> Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
>
Wendell E. Gragg Socorro Independent School District
HP Library Systems Specialist El Paso Tx
[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
^Liberal: One who believes that having self esteem is more important ^
^than doing something to warrant it! ^
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|
|
|