HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Reynolds, James" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Reynolds, James
Date:
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:31:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (107 lines)
I was looking through VESOFT's VECSL account today and found this.  Since
there has been a few questions lately regarding the 1990 Boston Tea Party
thought some of you would find this interesting.

James

James Reynolds
HP3000 System Administrator
Presbyterian Health Plan
Suite 300
2501 Buena Vista S.E
Albuquerque, NM  87106
[log in to unmask]
505-923-8076



                      THE UNBUNDLING OF IMAGE
                by Alexander "Sasha" Volokh, VESOFT
                    Published by VENEWS, #3, 1990.
   An account of the SIGIMAGE meeting at the Boston INTEREX conf.
(In the style of "The Man from Snowy River" by A.B."Banjo" Paterson)


    There was movement down in Boston, for the word had gotten out
    That IMAGE was unbundled by HP.
    And the vendors all decided not to sit around and pout,
    So they got together up on Level 3.
    All the wise and noted vendors from locations near and far,
    They mustered at SIG IMAGE Monday night.
    For it's easier to make a fuss where all the users are,
    And where people think that things are not so right.

    There was Gary Ho, a technical employee of HP,
    And Robert Hill, another HP guy;
    And Steve Cooper (of this IMAGE SIG a leader once was he),
    And Alfredo, who was also standing by.
    Roger Lawson was invited to fill in an empty chair,
    And O'Brien (Terry), who sells OMNIDEX.
    And Brad Tashenberg of BRADMARK was another person there,
    Whose new product has the name of SUPERDEX.

    Now the Hewlett-Packard panelists had such a thing to say:
    There are rumors going round, which aren't true.
    HP isn't killing IMAGE; it's committed all the way.
    IMAGE, just like SQL, is what we do.
    And we've talked with DISC & BRADMARK about working with their stuff
    To make IMAGE's performance have no peer.
   And we're still supporting IMAGE (though we think it's kind of tough)
    So our users don't have anything to fear.

    Then Alfredo thanked HP for all its work with DISC and Brad;
    Brad and Terry also thought the plan was swell;
    And they didn't think the concept of relationals was bad,
    But we shouldn't have to jump to SQL.
    Brad thought the best transition would be gradual and slow.
    Alfredo said to have an open ear
    To Steve Cooper and some other IMAGE experts whom we know
    So that all the nice suggestions they could hear.

    Every year, SIG IMAGE sent a few suggestions to HP
    As to what to put in IMAGE that was new.
    One of these, key item updates, on the list would always be
    But HP would never want that thing to do.
    Cooper said that, next to actions, HP's words speak very soft --
    This commitment from HP I don't believe.
    For I cannot say that changes have been implemented oft.
    I'm concerned about unbundling -- thus spake Steve.

    Now Fred White had written IMAGE and was sad, as you can guess.
    He said the word "unbundling" was a lie.
    IMAGE isn't like a product, but is part of FOS
    And that's why you get it when HPs you buy.
    But IMAGE, it has always been mistreated by HP
    And I wouldn't like to think the end is near.
    And I'm working with Alfredo, but in this, I speak for me,
    'Cause if not for me, you wouldn't all be here.

    And Wirt Atmar had a letter to the people who're in charge
    Of the marketing of those HP machines.
    The unbundling, he said, was a mistake, and it was large,
    Since about the user, HP don't care beans.
    It used to be that users, they came first in HP's thought,
    And the vendors, then, were happy campers too;
    To make pricing-based decisions -- that is not what HP ought!
    Engineering plans are what HP should do.

    Of the people at the meeting, many men agreed with Wirt
    That from under them was being pulled the RUG.
    People asked, Why is HP treating us vendors just like dirt?
    If we've no time to adjust, our grave is dug!
    And another thing was talked about by Larry Simonsen,
    Now we're forced to buy HPs with SQL.
    Then Steve Cooper was elected as the chairman once again.
    I hope this whole affair will turn out well.
%
%



--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above. It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately at [log in to unmask]

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2