Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:33:20 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> From: Jim Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
>
> "He [David Leichner, chief marketing officer of
> BluePhoenix Solutions Inc. of Cary, N.C.] says
> the legacy technology is losing market share
Market share is not everything to everybody. IBM's
System i and System Z have higher profit margins
than their open systems. I don't think IBM is interested
in getting into the position where they say "sure
we lose money on every unit we sell, but we make it
up in volume."
In 2003-4 I was a project manager for a migration from
a HP3000 system to a iSeries. The tools to make it
(the system, not the migration) useful and easy (that
were free) were just amazing. It's what I wished the
HP3000 could have been.
Personally I think from a technology point of view both
MPE and (above all) OpenVMS are better than the
underlying OS on System i, but neither had/have the
support that IBM throws at System i, so there you are.
Jerry Finn
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|