HP3000-L Archives

November 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Nov 1996 08:04:34 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I was chatting yesterday with someone who received a letter from HP
regarding their 925 system (they actually upgraded a number of years
ago, but that's another issue...).

In this letter HP advises them that the internal system clock will
not work past 12/31/99. I did not see the letter so I'm assuming this
is a correct summarization.

This leads me to ask two questions:

1) is this a 'guaranteed to not work' or is it a 'we haven't certified
   it past 12/31/99, but it will probably work' issue.

2) what other systems (series 900 only) might have this issue.

Duane Percox ([log in to unmask]  v/415.306.1608 f/415.365.2706)
http://www.qss.com/          http://www.qss.com/qwebs
http://www.qss.com/faq3k     http://www.qss.com/qsdk

ATOM RSS1 RSS2