Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Feb 1999 13:38:45 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Trudeau, James L writes:
> Like someone already mentioned, IBM has been at that for years.
> I used to work with it on a 4041(?) ahem....mainframe. They call
> it VM (virtual machine). One processor multiple OS's running under
> the virtual machine. They (IBM) had devloped it for in house use
> until some smarty britches said "Let's sell it". It wasn't all that popular
> when I was working with it in '85-'86 but I understand it grew in popularity
> later. Don't know where it stands now. Much as I hate to admit it,
> it was pretty slick.
We ran VM/CMS/VS1/MVS here up until 1989 to do all of our student administrative
functions as well as student programming lab work, switching to a 3000-based
administrative package that an incoming MIS director imported from his
previous college district.
I agree with James; VM was rather nifty.
--
Mark Bixby E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Coast Community College Dist. Web: http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/
District Information Services 1370 Adams Ave, Costa Mesa, CA, USA 92626-5429
Technical Support Voice: +1 714 438-4647
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)
|
|
|