HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:52:43 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
John Clogg writes:

> I believe Doug meant that the process that reserves LDEVs 90-99 at system
> startup will use numbers greater than 99 if there are conflicting LDEVs
> configured in SYSGEN.  It is only NMMGR that will be unable to configure
> those LDEVs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Tracy [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:08 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: VTERM configuration
>
>
> Doug Werth said:
> In any event, the LDEV numbers 90-99 are automatically reserved when the
> machine is started, and the numbers are not configurable. If you configure
a
> device in SYSGEN using the same LDEV number then the next available device
> number after 99 will be used. However, if you try to use an LDEV in the 90
> to 99 range in NMMGR that device configuration will fail because the DCC
> startup occurs after the system has already reserved 90 through 99 for
> Reverse VT, causing a device numbering conflict.
>
> I'm not so sure, we're using LDEV 90-96 for DISC, so how did I configure
> them if they are not configurable?

That's exactly right, John. Because the VTERM devices are created after the
system I/O configuration step (SYSGEN devices), but prior to the DCC startup
(NMCONFIG devices).

Doug.


Doug Werth                             Beechglen Development Inc.
[log in to unmask]                               Cincinnati, Ohio

ATOM RSS1 RSS2