HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Current 3000 hardware?
From:
Ron Burnett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ron Burnett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:23:59 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
> Is this even a wise choice at this point? Would a 9x8 box (or later) be a
> "better" choice?

Depending on your processing load, one of the newer 9x9 boxes would
be the best choice.

> As PowerHouse 7.x is the primary development environment, would it be best
> to approach Cognos first to see how much box we can afford?

Definitely check with Cognos.  They insisted that we pay a thumping
upgrade fee (more than the cost of the hardware and HP software)
to move from a 957 to a 969.  We had to shelve the project.

> --Glenn Cole

Ron Burnett
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2