HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Oct 1996 15:02:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Tracy writes:
> I seem to remember something from my Astronomy and Geography courses that
> every 400 years, leap-year is supposed to be ignored, and it was decided
...
> later refinement, I don't know), that the year 2000 was going to be one
> of those years.

Only in the sense that 2000 is evenly divisible by 400. :)

2000 is a leap year, so 2000-02-29 is a valid date that year.

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2