In a message dated 95-08-26 18:28:54 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Stan Sieler)
writes:
 
>Denys writes:
>...
>> If the only things
>> the folks could critisize are the smoking, the overflow crowds at the
party
>> and the noise level at the mixer, then we, as a committee have done a
great
>> job.
>
>
>This is my (probably) final comment on the Toronto Interex conference.
>
 
I sincerely hope not.
 
 
>I think what has happened is a combination of things:
>
>   1) Denys is quite sensitive about the conference, since
>      he was the chairman.
 
No, I had nothing better to do than to chair the conference last week.
 
>
>   2) HP3000-L/comp.sys.hp.mpe has grown amazingly since last year,
>      and this is the first time people have been able to immediately
>      communicate their impressions/ideas/feelings about a major
>      Interex conference just after the event.
 
I knew we worked to hard to get an Internet access room.
 
>
>   3) (I hope) people are simply forgetting to state what they consider
>      to be the obvious (it was a good, enjoyable conference with a
>      lot of "firsts"), when they comment/complain/suggest
>      about parts of it in an effort to make it even better.
>      However, all too often, the recipient of such remarks doesn't
>      realize what the commenter takes as "obvious".
>
>So, I'll say it again: I think the comittee did a great job.
>
>I also think that if the various suggestions are acted upon, Anaheim
>might even be better still!  (although it will have to try hard!)
 
Again, thank you.
 
Kind regards,
 
Denys. . .