According to Stan Sieler:
>
> Richard Gambrell ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
> : Some of us, like me, just don't get to doing these thing proactively ---
> : so we will be up to our neck when we need the password and we can't
> : get it quickly.
>
> Luckily, the passwords are not site specific.  :)
>
> Nonetheless, *WHY* have we accepted this situation?
>
> SS
>
 
IF we haven't signed the agreement, we could have trouble getting
the passwordks quickly - or get someone in trouble for giving them
to us. HP will only have *real* control over this if they move to
site-specific passwords.
 
There should be a better solution to this problem. Why doesn't the
"unsupported" status of these utilities protect HP from misuse of them
by us -- if that is what this is about? Or, am I missing something?
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125