We still use NS/VT these days and very little telnet.

It also helps that we have a 100 Megabit LANIC.

I'm hoping that the system won't croak because we don't have a DTC anymore and delete it out of the NMCONFIG.

We still have to use NMMGR for such things as hops across bridges and accessible networks and the 100Mbit LANIC specification, but look forward to NEVER HAVING TO USE TERMDSM AGAIN!!!

_________________________________________________
Dave Darnell wrote:

>>> Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]> 12/20 8:19 AM >>>
Can I assume from the tendency of sites to move away from DTCs that

1) telnet on the processor is now more reliable than on the DTC, and

2) telnet on the processor is no longer a resource hog on systems with a lot
of sessions?

Say, five years ago, when I was last involved in such matters, it seemed the
bet way to handle telnet was to do it on the DTC.

-DAve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Becker [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:12 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: DTC-less
>
>
> We are planning to take our DTC off our 929KS-020 and want to
> know if there are any considerations to eliminating the connection?
>