HP3000-L Archives

July 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:28:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Federal Budget Surplus....


> I don't think you really want to pay off all the national debt.  Part of
it
> is for payment of treasury bonds amongst other things.  Bonds play a very
> important position in our economy.  Take that away, and I'd hate to see
what
> happens to investments and to the stock market.  Of course, IMHO, way too
> much emphasis is placed on the stock market anyway (artificial limits on
how
> fast it can fall, but nothing on how fast it can rise?)...but that's the
> subject of another thread.
>
Well the Government wouldn't have to do away with debt completely - there is
still
the requirement for short time financing.  The debt could be 90% reduced and
not
hurt the Treasury bond market.

Nick D.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2