HP3000-L Archives

November 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:02:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Al,

As an alternative to alerting your operators to the tape request you could
add another tape drive to your system and have TurboStore run a "sequential"
backup. This means your operator would mount tapes in both drives and
TurboStore would automatically begin writing to the second tape drive when
the first tape filled up.

The syntax would be:

:file tape1;dev=7
:file tape2;dev=8
:store /; ;show=long;progress;directory;storeset=(*tape1,*tape2)

You can also run the backup to the tapes in parallel, writing to both tapes
simultaneously, but it needlessly introduces complexity to restoring files,
unless backup performance is a serious issue for you.

An added benefit to the second tape device is that it gives you an option to
drop back to one device when one of the drives fails, enabling you to run a
backup instead of waiting for a hardware repair.

Doug.

Doug Werth                             Beechglen Development Inc.
[log in to unmask]                               Cincinnati, Ohio

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nizzardini, Al" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:49 PM
Subject: Turbostore question


> We are using turbostore to perform our daily backups. The backup now
> requiring additional tape mounts. Is there a way to intercept the request
> that goes to the console and send it to everyone log on as op.prod?
>
> TIA,
>
> Al Nizzardini

ATOM RSS1 RSS2