Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Oct 1998 06:20:16 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This SSN situation is news to me. Are they talking about expanding it? I
just read an article in CIO that they are already starting to use a Zip+4+2
type zip code where the last two are bar coded. Are they talking about
expanding the phone numbers as well? I know we are burning through area
codes like flash paper in California, but I hadn't heard of any particular
plans at this point.
Thanks,
Shawn
toback2 <[log in to unmask]> on 10/23/98 05:59:29 PM
Please respond to toback2 <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: (bcc: Shawn Gordon/IS/FHM/FHS)
Subject: Re: All the problems (was: Y2K problem)
Gavin Scott writes:
>One of the hot questions is what will happen to IS budgets after the year
>2000. Will there be more Y2K work to do? Will all the Y2K programmers
>get laid off? Will budgets go down because the work is over? Will
budgets
>stay the same or even go up due to the backlog of projects that got
>postponed for the last three years because of Y2K? Will everyone simply
>move on to the next "Y2K" kind of problem (euro, SSN, etc.)?
Most Y2K conversions will include re-engineering to allow more
flexibility in the future, so that changes to the SSN, phone number
format, Dow Jones range and so on require a couple of twiddles in a table
somewhere, plus some report prettification.
Right?
-- Bruce
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Toback Tel: (602) 996-8601| My candle burns at both ends;
OPT, Inc. (800) 858-4507| It will not last the night;
11801 N. Tatum Blvd. Ste. 142 | But ah, my foes, and oh, my friends -
Phoenix AZ 85028 | It gives a lovely light.
btoback AT optc.com | -- Edna St. Vincent Millay
Mail sent to [log in to unmask] will be inspected for a
fee of US$250. Mailing to said address constitutes agreement to
pay, including collection costs.
|
|
|