This is from an interview with Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of staff 
of 
Colin Powell. 
Now, why would this interview/article be biased?

-------------------

<Snort>  This is Colin Powell's OPINION.  Even worse, it it the OPINION
of someones OPINION.  GWB wasn't involved enough in
the details...  how is this anything but opinion?  Why does GWB have a
staff to do work for him, so he can do all the work himself?  He has to
trust the information he was given by his staff is true, if he cannot do
that there is no reason to have a staff.  If it turns out a staff member
distorted details or cooked up false information, then that member's job
is in jeopardy and that is how it should be.

There is nothing in the article showing the opposing OPINION either, that
is bias.

Going back to what Denys said some time ago, I am sure if you ask Zell
Miller if he thinks the Dem's are on the wrong track, his OPINION will
be obvious.  If that is the only OPINION presented, what does that mean?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *