 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:51:52 +0200 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi
The reason why we are going from IMAGE to Oracle is only because we are
reprogramming our programs into JAVA and for a period of time we have to
run two systems side by side using the same databases (Oracle) until we are
done.
Regards
Mikael A. Olesen
Programmør
Den Kristelige Fagbevægelse
(tlf) Kontor +45 8911 2390
(tlf) Hjemmearbejdsplads 8745 0890
B T Vikram
Kumar To: Mikael A Olesen <[log in to unmask]>
<vikram@india cc: [log in to unmask]
.hp.com> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L]
13-10-00
12.43
Attention is drawn to discussion in this list two weeks ago, about Oracle
on
3000. Oracle has decided not to support its database on 3000, starting from
end of this year. In this context, do you really want to migrate from IMAGE
to
Oracle. May we know of technical reasons (there may be business reasons),
if
any for this. If the reason is just to move to a RDBMS, please have a
relook
at relational acces to IMAGE through IMAGE/SQl.
Regards,
Vikram
Mikael A Olesen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are there anyone out there that runs HP on HP3000 on a Oracle database?
> We have just moved some of our Image bases to Oracle and have run into
> major performance problems. A quick screen takes 2-3% cpu and each
search
> can take from between 15 sec to 15 minutes! - The normal time is 1-2
sec!
>
> Does anyone out there have any experience on this?
>
> Regards
>
> Mikael Olesen
> dkf-Denmark
|
|
|
