HP3000-L Archives

July 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Doug Werth <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jul 1998 21:16:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
From: Patrick Santucci <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Wirt Atmar wrote:
>
>>                                                    ...until someone
starts
>> charging you for every packet that you send out. Then, at least, it will
be a
>> higher class of spam.
>
>I'm with Doug Werth on this one. Seems to me the people with the most
>money are the professional porn peddlers. If you knock out the
>small-time operators selling beanie babies and the like, what you are
>left with is the lowest class of spammer, not the highest. (Also, I hope
>no one starts charging me for the bandwidth of my rants! :)
>

Whoa there! In all honesty I agree with what Wirt said. I firmly believe
that the ability to use Deja News to find old postings far outweighs the
annoyance of spam. I find it easier to use and faster than searching on
Raven. I find the spam just as distasteful as the next person, but I filter
it to a separate folder, press the delete key and move on.

My "Baloney" comment actually was a simple reply to Wirt's straight line
"higher class of spam." Wirt baited me!

Doug "why am I at work on a holiday weekend" Werth

Doug Werth                                     Beechglen Development Inc.
[log in to unmask]                                       Cincinnati, Ohio

The opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or opinions
of Beechglen Development. They might, but not necessarily. They represent
solely the opinions of the author.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2