HP3000-L Archives

August 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Ted Ashton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Aug 1998 09:52:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Thus it was written in the epistle of Gavin Scott,
> It gets very messy very quickly.

It sounds that way!  Would it be sufficient then to just require that the
process abortions start at the leaves of the tree and work their way back to
the root, waiting for the children to go away before starting on the parents?
I know that it would be slower than the current method, but the gain of not
having orphan processes would, I think, be worth it.  MPE could report partial
abort or some such.  The job/session would be left in an ugly state, but, I
think, not quite so ugly as it is now.

Ted
--
Ted Ashton ([log in to unmask]), Info Serv, Southern Adventist University
          ==========================================================
Of all the intellectual faculties, judgment is the last to mature. A child
under the age of fifteen should confine its attention either to subjects
like mathematics, in which errors of judgment are impossible, or to subjects
in which they are not very dangerous, like languages, natural science,
history, etc.
                        -- Schopenhauer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2