At 01:35 PM 4/10/96 GMT, Winston Kriger wrote:
>In article <960409182702_509618151@mail04>, Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
>says:
>>
>>Winston writes:
>>
>>>It probably has something to do with the fact that Eunuchs don't have
>>weenies.
>>
>>I don't want to ruin a good joke with unnecessary technical detail, but it
>>isn't the weenie part that gets cut off when you convert a fully functional
>>operating system into a Eunuch.
>>
>>Wirt Atmar
>
>Actually, the proposition attributed to me was authored by Jim Knight.
>I believe that Steve Dirickson then followed-up Jim's view of how
>Eunuchs are created, with a similar technical correction. Perhaps
>this question should be referred to the U.S. Surgeon General's office
>for final resolution (assuming that a Surgeon General can be confirmed
>by the Senate).  I believe the confusion comes from the on-going
>deliberations concerning the proposed 64-bit Eunuchs standard.
>
>Winston K.
>
>
Yes it was me, and I knew it was an anatomically incorrect joke, but then,
it wasn't politically correct either ;-)
 
Jim
 ===========================================================================
=====
      >>> Welcome to M-Net, America's first public access Unix System! <<<
         (313) 996-3733 (14400-8-N-1) - or - telnet m-net.arbornet.org
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]