Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 25 Sep 1995 12:24:43 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mike Whiteley wrote:
> 'thought you'd like to know what the 'Oxford Dictionary 3rd Edition
> (c) Oxford University Press 1988' (English Language) has to say
> for 'guy':
>
> guy (2) n 1. a figure in the form of a man dressed in old clothes,
> representing Guy Fawkes and burnt on 5 November in memory of the
> Gunpowder plot [1600 something]. 2. an oddly-dressed person.
> 3 a man -v. to ridicule especially by comic imitation
>
> Does that mean calling computer-people "guys" infers badly dressed
> programmers who should be burnt at the stake? :)
Given the number of badly dressed programmers, I think might constitue
genocide.
While I'm wasting bandwidth, a section from "The American Vest Pocket
Dictionary":
guy, n. . . . used to guide and steady
Anyone who knows me will see that this definition is clearly lacking.
=======================================================================
Guy Smith Voice: 804-527-4000 ext 6664
Circuit City Stores, Inc. FAX: 804-527-4008
9950 Mayland Drive E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
Richmond, VA 23233-1464 Private E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
USA Web page: http://www.infi.net/~guys
The thoughts expressed herein are mine and do not reflect those of my
employer, or anyone with common sense.
|
|
|