HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Byron Welch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Byron Welch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:26:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Larry,
  I have used both telnet and NS/VT.  The major difference I have noticed
has been when making connections through the Internet.  NS/VT seems to hold
a connection better and if the connection is lost on the client end the
session on the HP3000 also exits.  With telnet I have ended up with a number
of ghost sessions left on the 3000 when I lost the connection.

Byron Welch
Manager In-House projects
Creative Computing, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Folk [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 9:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Telnet vs NS/VT


We have been using NS/VT on our MPE/ix box for terminal emulation on our
PC's.  Over the weekend, we brought up telnet services and now have the
option of using telnet.  At the terminal end, we have noted no major
differences between telnet and NS/VT.

Now for the question...are there any advantages of using one method over
the other?


Larry Folk                              Kline Iron & Steel Co., Inc.
I.S. Manager                            Columbia, SC
[log in to unmask]                803-251-8026, fax 803-251-8080

ATOM RSS1 RSS2