HP3000-L Archives

June 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Berkowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Berkowitz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:17:46 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Connie Samuel writes


HP just sent us the tapes to upgrade our operating system--We got 6.5
around the middle of May and then 7.0 arrived last week.
We were wondering which we should upgrade to--my boss wondered how long
7.0 has been available, so I am asking the list for info re: experiences
with each.
-----------------------------------------------------
Assuming you're on a machine that supports 7.0 I'd go to that, not 6.5.  7.0
will be around to 3000 EOL and should get more attention that 6.5.  I've
been on 7.0 since December, 2001 on a 995/500 and have put on all patches as
of 5/27.  Running fine.

Mike Berkowitz
Guess? Inc.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2