HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re[2]: Telnet vs NS/VT
From:
Bonnie Roman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:21:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Authorized by... (18 lines) 
Larry said
  I have used both telnet and NS/VT.  The major difference I have noticed
has been when making connections through the Internet.  NS/VT seems to hold
a connection better and if the connection is lost on the client end the
session on the HP3000 also exits.  With telnet I have ended up with a number
of ghost sessions left on the 3000 when I lost the connection.
_____


My experience has been the opposite - I setup a job within JMS3000 to abort
sessions and stop the scheduler if sessions continue to be active. Well,
every
time I get page because JMS3000 stops its a stuck nsvt session.
I haven't had a problem with TELNET. We're on MPE/iX 5.5 PP6...

my .02
Bonnie

ATOM RSS1 RSS2