HP3000-L Archives

July 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joseph Rosenblatt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Joseph Rosenblatt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:10:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Patrick Santucci wrote:

How does McKessonHBOC justify telling its clients the "Deadline for
[Amisys] customer upgrades to 6.5" is October 1 and, "At that time, our
secondary system will be eliminated as a contingency for backward
compatibility issues. If a backward compatibility issue is identified, the
resolution may require an upgrade to 6.5."?? I ask that question based on
the following observations:

Is this the AMISYS that threatened to pull my support for going to 5.5 a
year after its release?
It took them until late 1998 to go to 5.5 now they're pushing to go to 6.5
within six months. Is that progress or what?

Joseph Rosenblatt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2