Tracy-
FWIW, I would suggest using Patch/iX. After my early mistrust of this "new"
technology, I have come to really like it. In fact when moving a system
from, say 5.5 to 6.0 and PP2, I do the least possible that I can before
switching to Checklist A where I can use Patch/iX. It hasn't been flawless,
though. But much more robust than AUTOPAT.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Tracy Pierce [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 9:33 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: confirm 6.0 pp 2 please?
Autopat! (This seemed to be the recommended method based on choosing
checklists etc. I'll try Patch/iX for our first reactive, which will be ...
???
Tracy Pierce
415-923-2266
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Durand [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 9:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: confirm 6.0 pp 2 please?
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, what did you use to install this patch?
> Patch\iX, Autopat,...?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Barry
>
>
> On 16 Jan 01, at 7:19, Tracy Pierce wrote:
>
> > Howdy. I up'd our dev box to 6.0 pp2 on Sat, nearly
> painless, 5 hours.
> > Doing a SHOWME yields
> > USER: #S14,TRACY.VMS,KTP (IN PROGRAM)
> > RELEASE: C.60.00 MPE/iX HP31900 C.16.01 USER VERSION: C.60.00
> > CURRENT: TUE, JAN 16, 2001, 7:19 AM
> > LOGON: TUE, JAN 16, 2001, 5:50 AM
> > CPU SECONDS: 2 CONNECT MINUTES: 89
> > $STDIN LDEV: 5 $STDLIST LDEV: 5
> > I am YODA (HP3000 937SX).
> >
> > Shouldn't that say
> > RELEASE: C.60.00 MPE/iX HP31900 C.16.01 USER VERSION: C.60.02
> >
> > ????
> >
> >
> > K Tracy Pierce, Systems Programmer
> > Golden Gate Bridge, Hwy & Trnsp Dist
> > PO Box 9000, Presidio Station
> > San Francisco, CA 94129-0601
> > mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > 415-923-2266
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Barry Durand [log in to unmask]
> Allegro Consultants 408.252.2330
> http://www.allegro.com/people/durand/index.html
> Opinions are mine, not my employer's
> ------------------------------------------
>
|
