HP3000-L Archives

January 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Free replacment for Glance needed
From:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:57:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
Both get their numbers from the MPE Measurement Interface, so I doubt there
is much difference in the results they report if/when their sample intervals
coincide.  I have seen nothing in my experience with both products to
indicate that SOS is "more accurate" than Glance.  Anyway, if they disagree,
how would we know which is right?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lendy Sanford Cooke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Free replacment for Glance needed


I have worked on both Glance and SOS.   SOS gives accurate
numbers compared to Glance.
Lendy

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2