Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:40:35 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark Wonsil wrote:
>
> The other option is to still use Image and create XML documents on the fly,
> if your application lends itself to do so. Certainly, one can store
> marked-up text in an Image database. It may take multiple records, but it
> is done all the time as you are well aware. You could use Omnidex or
> Superdex to do keyword searches. Finally, you could create a text field
> that holds the filename and location of the text.
>
I've wondered if Image couldn't be used to hold an XML parsed tree, by
clever use of keys and just two or three detail sets holding generic
data. Like a bill of materials or other hierarchical data, folded
back upon itself.
Richard
--
Richard L Gambrell, Director of Computing Systems and Networks
Information Technology Division
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
103 Hunter Hall, Department Code 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
voice mail/cell phone: 423-432-5122
private e-mail: [log in to unmask]
UTC fax: 423-755-4150
UTC phone: 423-755-4551
UTC email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|