HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Interesting date
From:
"Geiser, Joe" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Geiser, Joe
Date:
Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:29:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
Allow me to quote from a contract addendum that we
are being asked to incorporate - this should back up
Cecile's assertion:

"Leap Year:  shall mean the year during which an extra
day is added in February (February 29th).  Leap year
occurs in all years ((divisible by 400) or (evenly
divisible by 4 AND not evenly divisible by 100))"

This, of course, is from the "legal folks" but is
also accurate.

Joe

----------
From:   [log in to unmask]
Sent:   Tuesday, October 08, 1996 9:19 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: Interesting date

Years divisible by 4 are leap years
Except that years divisible by 100 are NOT leap years
Except that years divisible by 400 ARE leap years.

Therefore 2000 is a leap year.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2