HP3000-L Archives

August 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Elmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Elmer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:53:59 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Mark Klein ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: Alfred quotes in his essay:
 
: >...... Wim Roelandts, a high-ranking HP
: >executive, said in an interview with Computerworld
: >(November 2, 1992), "you can take unix software and
: >port it to MPE with the same degree of difficulty
: >as if you were porting it to another version of
: >unix."
 
: Having just ported GCC/G++ to the 3000, I can attest that it is
: possible, but not necessarily easy. However, the same can be said about
: porting gcc/g++ between various architectures that support Unix. This
: can further be interpolated to include other software, not just gcc.
 
Having ported a large portion of what's available on JAZZ, I think the
statement is absolutely correct.  When we began the POSIX effort, the
typical porting time was measured in _years_.  Now, it's measured in
weeks or days - just like any Unix to Unix port.  If you look at the
statement from an MPE point of view, it can be interpreted as a little
barb for Unix-philes :)
 
Steve
 
P.S.  We were once told that the Unix philosphy is "Standard is better
than better."  You be the judge.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2