Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Shahan, Ray |
Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:56:38 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One negative comes to mind for being the 'first one on the block' to migrate
is that you will be the ones to learn the unknown pitfalls.
Another would be that after some of these pitfalls become known, so too,
will tools/education to overcome them.
However, best of luck, and keep us posted. :-)
Ray Shahan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dovid Samber [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:53 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: migration
>
> We are examining the migration option like everyone else. Our staff of
> ten developers supports 2 manufacturing/distribution companies. We see an
> advantage to migrating earlier than later - to avoid a lengthy 'limbo'
> state during which the investment in our developers is under-utilized.
>
> For those of you out there with development staffs, please share your
> thoughts regarding the pros/cons of aggressively moving forward with
> migration.
>
>
> Dovid Samber
> Steel Warehouse - MIS Mgr
> 2722 W Tucker Drive, South Bend IN
> [log in to unmask]
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|