Glenn writes:
> Given the myriad versions of MOVER (I count four, which is at least
> three too many), it seems we need *something* else.  Whether that
> something else is a "universal MOVER," or 3k's nmencode/nmdecode,
> I don't really care.  But it sure appears we need something.
> And nmencode/nmdecode is based on a formal standard.
>
> Thoughts, anyone?

Telamon's LZW ... it works on a variety of platforms, and is flexible
on handling binary files (i.e., it can adapt to common PC -> HP 3000 upload
mistakes)

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html