Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:39:18 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Yokem - as I said in my last post, I'm done.
John Testa
SLPS Homewood
708-647-4346
[log in to unmask]
Brice Yokem
<[log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask]
> cc:
Sent by: HP-3000 Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: US Politics
Systems
Discussion
<[log in to unmask]
TC.EDU>
10/21/2004 03:16
PM
Please respond to
Brice Yokem
And that is how you would, in summary, define Carl Sagan's contribution to
popular science?
That's all I need to know. Thanks. :)
-------------------
I did not say that. I will say that when Carl Sagan was being a scientist,
he was a good one, but with regards to Nuclear Winter, he was not being
a scientist.
How would you apply his 'baloney detection toolkit' to his Nuclear Winter
position? Would you say he is guilty of the same kind of conclusion
jumping as GWB is regarding the WMD issue in Iraq?
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|