HP3000-L Archives

February 2002, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: A valentine to Walter Hewlett
From:
John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:32:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
Very interesting, Wirt, especially all the disclaimers at the end.  Now,
why aren't the bonuses that everyone stands to get tied to the performance
of the merged enterprise instead of tied to the merger being voted in favor
of?  The stockholders are only compensated if the merged enterprise is
successful, why should it be any different for the executives who are
making the day-to-day decisions?  This is how Enrons and Global Crossings
are created.

John Lee

At 05:22 AM 2/14/02 EST, Wirt Atmar wrote:
>The following link will lead you to the letter the HP board sent to Walter
>Hewlett yesterday:
>
>    http://www.votethehpway.com/news/whewlettletter2.13.pdf
>
>Wirt Atmar
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2