HP3000-L Archives

July 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denys Beauchemin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 9 Jul 1999 20:46:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
Gavin writes feverishly:

... I said "unrelated" because current PA-RISC chips support both 32-bit and
64-bit programs and so apparently will IA-64 chips, meaning that a move
to support true 64-bit apps could happen on today's PA-2.0 systems or
could wait until after the move to IA-64, or might never happen.  Current
HP-UX supports simultaneous execution of 32-bit (PA-RISC 1.x style)
programs and newer 64-bit (PA-RISC 2.0 style) programs, and HP-UX on
IA-64 will do the same.

Also, HP-UX is currently "singe source" for PA-RISC 1.x, PA-RISC 2.0 narrow,
PA-RISC 2.0 wide (64-bit), *and* IA-64 (according to HP), so "forking"
seems to no longer be an issue at least for HP-UX.  A reasonable amount of
cleverness ought to allow MPE to do the same if they are so inclined.


And on that note, this story in the news:  Merced may be delayed even further.
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0%2c4%2c38924%2c00.html?dd.ne.txt.0709.05

Kind regards,

Denys. . .

Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP
(800) 323-8863  (281) 288-7438         Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com                             www.hicomp.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2