HP3000-L Archives

February 1997, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Holger Wiemann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Holger Wiemann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Feb 1997 09:10:06 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
> I'm planning to divide my single System volumeset, into
> smaller, functionally-related volumesets. But, as I plan
> how to divide the accounts, I'm not sure where to place my
> vendor accounts (like CCC, NETBASE, ROBELLE, TELAMON, VESOFT,
> ORBIT, MBFOSTER etc.).
>
> Should I let them stay on my System Volume set, or should I
> locate them on their own VENDOR Volumeset?
>
> Thanks for any recommendations
>
> Mike Gabriel
> Hughes Avicom International
> [log in to unmask]

Hi Mike,

I can give some hints to NETBASE:

If you're using shadowing with the Quest's NETBASE (or HP's SharePlex)
stuff and you have a high rate of created transactions to be shadowed,
it's wise to place the NETBASE account to volumeset with low IO
activities; this is by all changing accesses to files specified in
NBDIR are intercepted by the NETBASE shell and cause entries in the
central message file NBM.IPC.NETBASE read by the export process.
If you monitor a growing count of allocated disc sectors to that
message file, try to nail the export process to priority BS
(NBCTRL.PUB.NETBASE, CONFIG, MODIFY SHADOW ...)

Hope, this helps you in one of your questions, regards

Holger Wiemann
HP Response Center, Germany

ATOM RSS1 RSS2