HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 May 2002 14:09:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At a past job, I was shown another good reason for NOT trying to squeeze two
links over one cable.  Some CAT5 cable manufacturers 'cheat' on the 4-5 and
7-8 pairs.  Since they are not used in typical 10baseT and 100baseT
ethernet, those pairs are not twisted to CAT5 specs.  The cabling person who
told me this then demonstrated, by stripping some cable we had laying
around.  Sure enough, the 1-2 and 3-6 pairs were nice and tightly wound,
while the other two were nowhere near the same.

Steve Miller
Beechglen Develoment, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio

Jeff Kell wrote:
>
> ... Pinout-wise
> both 10Mb and 100Mb only use 1-2 and 3-6 (green and orange in your
> example).  4-5 and 7-8 are typically unused, though in some instances
> they can be used to "squeeze" two links over one cable (with suitable
> wiring accomodations on either end), but not recommended as the coming
> Gigabit over copper standard requires all 4 pairs and you will have to
> redo your cable infrastructure.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2