Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Sep 1998 13:08:57 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Scott McClellan writes:
> > So if you do much work with POSIX or HFS directories, do not
> > install MPEJXV9B.
> This means, "veto the patch", not "avoid installing PP5" (IMO).
That's what it means to me too. Since I haven't installed PP5 here, my
personal experience only pertains to just MPEJXV9B and not any other portion
of PP5.
As Scott points out, MPEJXV9B is easy enough to veto using Patch/iX. But I'm
holding off on PP5 until we hear more about the HPDATEDIFF problems (i.e. is
it just one intrinsic, or is it a wider problem, etc?).
--
Mark Bixby E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Coast Community College Dist. Web: http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/
District Information Services 1370 Adams Ave, Costa Mesa, CA, USA 92626-5429
Technical Support Voice: +1 714 438-4647
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)
|
|
|