HP3000-L Archives

March 2000, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Erik Vistica <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Erik Vistica <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 12:08:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Curtis Cappell wrote:
>
> Here is just one more way of looking at the 3 doors problem:
>
> Say every contestant chooses not to switch.  Then they will win, on average,
> 1/3 of the time, which is their probability of winning when they first
> picked their door, even if Monty reveals one of the empty doors.
>
> The converse to not switching, provided everything else stays the same
> (Monty always reveals an empty door), is switching.  The converse
> probability to 1/3 (not switching) is 1 - 1/3, or 2/3 (switching).  It is
> better to switch.  Marilyn was correct.
>

Agreed. 1/3 I'm right, 2/3 I'm wrong, take the other door.

The view that the odds are 1/2 would be true *only if* Monty was allowed
to move (if he wished) the prize after the 1st pick and before the 2nd.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2