Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Mar 1998 13:23:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> From: Art H Bahrs <[log in to unmask]>
> T
> um.... I have used both Reflection (DOS & Windows) and Minisoft in a
> previous life.... (Reflection is on my machine here at BCBSO :))
>
> Minisoft did look different... and it did have trouble handling files
> that had been downloaded or transferred in label format by
> Reflection...but... I found that the Tech Support people at Minisoft were
> much more helpful and available when I would call for help :) :)
>
> I mean I was on a first name basis with Dell up at Minisoft Tech
> Support! hehehe
>
> Art "It's Friday!!! hehehe " Bahrs
>
> From: [log in to unmask] on 03/26/98 09:30 PM
>
>
> I use both REFLECTIONS and MINISOFT. Minisoft cannot hold a candle to
> Reflections. For one the buffer size cant be increased in Minisoft or
> at least not on the version I am on. And I have found that it has
> problems when using labels on file transfers.....plus it just aint as
> friendly....big buttons....looks ugly.
>
OK, Friday. We tried Minisoft'92 a long time ago. It had a problem
with printing at the time. I don't know if its been fixed yet, but
I DO know that Minisoft's answer was, to net it out, "too bad". We
needed printing, so back to Reflection. A liitle pricey, but it
WORKS. I have no interest in WRQ and could also say that I did
not appreciate its abandonment of PCL.
Nick Demos [log in to unmask]
Performance Software Group
Tel. (410) 788-6777 Fax (410) 788-4476
|
|
|