Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 May 1995 00:08:55 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
David Greer ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: I did a lot of work with the Lynx 2-3-7 distribution. Unfortunately,
: I ran into various problems with the owners of the source code that
: have so far stopped the changes from getting into the master Lynx
: distribution. I still am working on it.
: One thing that has held me back is a conversation that I had with
: Steve Elmer at Sigsoftvend. What C #define should we use for
: identifying MPE/POSIX specific changes to the code? I had been using:
: #define _MPEXL_SOURCE
I think the best thing is to not get stuck on silly things like this.
Whether its called _MPEXL_SOURCE or something else really doesn't make
any difference, and we're better off debating real work issues.
I guess "MPEXL" is a little dated, so we could go with "MPEIX" or even
simpler would be just "MPE".
I vote for #define _MPE. I don't really like the underscore, but if you
like it that is fine. It also minimizes typing (I'm lazy, I guess)...
Mike
---
Mike Belshe
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|