Bill,

thanks for the info, I was not aware of that new interex list.
But if anybody here has some info to provide, feel free to tel them to me.
JM

Bill Lancaster a écrit dans le message ...
JM,

Can I suggest that you post this message to the Interex EMC list?  You can
subscribe as follows:

>The High Availability Forum of Interex is pleased to announce that
>EMC and Interex have formed a new mailing list, [log in to unmask]  The
>purpose of the mailing list is create a communication vehicle in
>which you can discuss your issues and share your ideas regarding EMC
>products with EMC and yourpeers.  EMC will  participate actively in
>the discussions to ensure your questions are answered.
>
>Instructions to subscribe to the list:
>sent email to: [log in to unmask]
>In the subject field type the word: subscribe
>


Bill Lancaster

At 10:16 AM 5/28/99 GMT, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>we implemented an EMC² SRDF configuration between a source  HP3000 and a
>target HP3000 series 979.
>
>The 979 target is daily working with HP disks
>(Emc² disks in Readonly mode). In case of backup, we reboot it on Emc²
disks
>(not seeing HP disks: FW-SCSI cards are not defined in SYSGEN when using
that
>config group).
>
>We recently read in an EMC² document that in case of backup
>(using Emc² disks), we should have to disconnect the SCSI link of the HP
>internal disks and unplug them. That seems to be crazy in case of emergency
!
>On the other hand, we rebooted the 979 system many times using Emc² disks
>only without any trouble.
>
>Does anybody use such a configuration ? Can
>someone validate that information which was never provided to us by Emc²
>neither HP until today ?
>
>If any, is that restriction to be applied to all
>9x9 series or only for 959/969 series ?
>
>Thanks to all for helping us on that
>subject.
>
>JM.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>