Guessing that datasets #1 and #2 you mention are both details this seems
perfectly normal.

I don't see any reason dataset #2 should be populated just because
dataset #1 has something.  (The application may care, but that is an
'application' problem.)

The automatic master on the other hand, should be populated with
anything datasets #1 or #2 have.

Tracy Johnson
Measurement Specialties, Inc. 

BT







NNNN


> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eben Yong
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] image conundrum
> 
> 
> We have just located a potential problem and would appreciate 
> some answers from the image gurus.
> 
> Given an automatic master dataset, and two detail datasets.  
> Both details are linked to the automatic master by the very 
> first field in the dataset.  Given key XXXXX, and a record 
> existing in dataset #1, performing a DBFIND on dataset #2 
> yields a hit (DBFIND DB-STATUS = 0).  But of course, the 
> DBGET yields nothing.  Does anyone have experience with this 
> and/or knows the reasons for it?  Is this normal?
> 
> We can repeat this problem with multiple databases and datasets.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your assistance!
> 
> Eben Yong
> Health Plan of San Mateo
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *