Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 1997 12:32:00 P |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark B. after / between others on this thread:
>The offline HP utility COPYUTIL will do this type of raw
>backup/restore.
>I've used it on both my 3000 and 9000 machines to take
>special backups. I warn you though, it's got to be the world's
>slowest backup program.
We used it once too; or rather, our CE used it; to replace a
drive that Predictive said was going bad. It worked fine and
thereby saved a RELOAD; however, note that Mark's above
warning is not an exaggeration. Since we have three volume
sets on our machine (USER, BACKUP, and the <long_name>,
doing an INSTALL of the <long_name> would have been
noticeably faster than using COPYUTIL.... Of course if you
have 100+ spindles and one of them in a large volume set
fails, COPYUTIL could be a real timesaver....
The ever-present possibility, however low, that a single disc
may for whatever reason decide to scramble itself leads me to
put in three "non-plug" plugs; for things that will allow / will
help avoid the need to resort to COPYUTIL and/or RELOAD:
(1) Make sure PREDICTIVE SUPPORT is operational and the
link to HP is working. Pay attention to what it reports; it has
warned us of several discs that were starting to have problems
before they failed catastrophically.
(2) If you have anything more than a very small system, run
more than one volume set. The slight additional complexity
to manage > one is well worth it for the extra flexibility and
benefits.
(3) Run MirrorDisc/iX on all non-SYSTEM volume sets. The
need for COPYUTIL or RELOAD is then moot... On all but
the <long_name>, that is... An if HP will just implement
mirroring of the <long_name>, the problem will be completely
solved. :-)
(4) Oops: One more thing (except that I'm not putting in a
plug for this one): RAID. I still like the MirrorDisc solution....
Ken Sletten
|
|
|