Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 2 Jan 1996 16:28:46 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hmmmph. We don't even have a NM Query, 'less its named something like
"foo" or "ralph" or ... :-(
-Bob
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: QUERY still CM on C.50.03
Author: Larry Boyd <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 1/2/96 3:51 PM
Leonard and Ken had questions about whether it was proper to use NM
Query. The bottom line answer is most definitely. I am surprised that
someone recommended to Leonard *not* to use NMQUERY in 4.0. I would be
interested in why that was recommended.
(of course the other interesting question I have is why is CM Query sent
as the 'default' and not NM? Hmm?)
Larry
>
> Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote after I wrote:
>
> >QUERYNM has been around for a while, 4.0 I think is when we noticed it. HP
> >recommended that we not do on 4.0 what you are suggesting. What do you
> know
> >that has changed?
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>Almost overlooked something after our new 959KS
> >>went online today: Even after installing Express-3
> >>release of MPE (C.50.03), the QUERY in PUB.SYS
> >>is still CM. You have to RENAME or PURGE
> >>QUERY; then RENAME QUERYNM,QUERY to
> >>get native mode.
> [....SNIP my stuff....]
>
> Confess I don't recall ever hearing that HP flat out
> recommended not doing this even on 4.0, but from
> your experience obviously someone did.
>
> I can't speak for the Database Lab, but I certainly
> got the impression from the RC that turning
> QUERYNM into QUERY is now fully supported.
> Maybe someone from HP would like to comment ?
>
> Also note that RC told me this is the only file HP
> sends out in this catagory, where you have to do a
> PURGE/RENAME plus RENAME to get NM.
>
> Ken Sletten
>
|
|
|