Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:55:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Interesting article:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nf/20021023/bs_nf/19752
Currently IMAGE does phenomenal amounts of heavy lifting. Should we
succeed in making IMAGE open source, we'll have to educate database experts
like Mr. Claybrook. He makes a good point in his statement about the
difficulty of switching once you've made substantial investments in a
database.
Excerpt:
'Claybrook also said it is difficult for open source products to gain
ground in the market for large, mission-critical applications in major
enterprises. "When it gets down to serious, big-time database uses, I don't
know of any open source [database] that comes close to Oracle or DB2," he
said.
He added that once companies establish a large database with a costly
proprietary system, it is hard to abandon that investment. "If you've been
using Oracle for 10 years, it's damn hard to switch out," he said.'
Frank Gribbin
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|