Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:13:23 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And I've just have to follow up on yours, Frank. I don't have hard
proof, but I'm pretty sure about this - at a prior job, the one and
only production and development machine, a 3000/950, was started after
updating to MPE/XL 2.2 with patches over a Memorial Day weekend. It
wasn't shut down until I updated to 4.0 over Thanksgiving the
following year, some eighteen months later. (We used a contributed
utility to handle EST/EDT time changes.)
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 20:21:47 -0400 , Frank Letts <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I just had to follow up on Lars' post. Does anyone have an
>example of a UNIX or any microsoft system that you could
>make that statement about? I doubt it, but will listen for
>responses. Plenty of 1000 & 3000 stories to go around, I'll
>bet none from the "modern" camp.
>
>Frank Letts (aka 'Fast Frank')
>http://freeweb.pdq.net/fbt1
>[log in to unmask]
>
>----------
>>
>> Jim wrote...
>>
>> >SYSTEM START TIME -- SUN, OCT 18, 1998, 9:09 PM
>> >LAST ERROR CHECK TIME -- WED, JUN 2, 1999, 3:46 PM
>>
>> Hmmm. Too sad that memory replacement will require a reboot.
>>
>> ;-) Lars
>
|
|
|